“The truth is, you’re the weak, and I’m the tyranny of evil men. But I’m tryin’, Ringo. I’m trying real hard to be the shepherd.”
~ Jules Winnfield, Pulp Fiction.WORDS: Bruce Ray Riggs, Kurt Kallenbach and Tommie Sassard.
Recognize somebody?
Calling all sheep and shepherds. It may not have escaped your attention that a growing number of people in America and around the world are starting to become politically aware. This awareness is not dependent upon attending rallies, watching the TV news, or queuing for the ballot box. It has nothing to do with the left or the right, the Democrats or the Republicans. No, it goes far deeper than that. It’s an awareness that comes from an innate and shared sense that something is very wrong with the world we’ve been born into. And it’s coupled with an urgent realization that it’s up to us to change it, or tolerate it. The choice is ours.
“This is just the way it is! There’s no point wasting your time trying to change anything! Just do your best in this life and keep your head down!”
Baaaaaaaaa. Did you hear that sound? It was the wooly voice of apathy, the enemy of awareness. Perhaps you recognize it? That’s a start. Apathy makes it easier to accept the over-regulation of our lives, the constant wars, the huge disparities in wealth, the continual despoliation of the environment, and the famines and food shortages as “normal.” Apathy declares that these things are with us for life and are impossible to change.
The antidote to apathy is awareness. And the antidote to awareness is apathy. How do we effect positive change in the world? Our teacher for today goes by the name of Mr. Bruce Ray Riggs. He’s running for a U.S. Senate seat in Florida and he’s also the man behind www.dirtyunclesam.com and www.proveitsreal.com
Bruce’s history lesson isn’t easy to accept. But hey, go check it out and remember where you heard about it first …
WARNING
Most Americans probably aren’t ready to accept the facts of life, especially as they are presented in this article. Sadly, either we believe we “know it all” already, or we do not possess the literacy skills to comprehend them. On that note, thanks for joining us. But please, be warned if you insist on reading on, to be ready for everything to change. We appreciate that’s quite a big deal—especially for a magazine you randomly picked up in a grow store…”
To the citizens of the United States, I have some bad news. I say “news” but it actually happened over 148 years ago, on July 1st, 1862, to be exact, and it’s hardly something that’s going to make the headlines on Fox News tonight. But that’s another story.
So what happened all those years ago that’s still so important today? Well, in short, the people we believe were elected and trusted to represent us in Washington D.C. actually changed our “standing” in law from one of the law of the land—Constitutional or Common Law—to an unlawful system based entirely on legislative or “statutory” commercial law. Doesn’t sound like that big a deal, right? Well bear with me on this one.
First off, what is Common Law? Well, it’s a bit like common sense. It’s an irrefutable and permanently applicable law, which as a peaceful individual is unlikely to ever affect you. Provided you keep the peace, do not cause injury, harm or loss to another individual, you will remain within the terms of Common Law and will not break it. Basically it says, “Don’t be an asshole,”—but hey, you knew that already didn’t ya?
Common Law is ancient. Established by Alfred the Great (AD 871-899), it was developed by the British people over more than a thousand years. It is common because it applies to everyone equally.
So what happened in this relatively very young country called America? Well, our “representatives” knowingly and intentionally cheated us, the American people, out of our lawful standing in common law (see Article III, Section 2, Clause 1, U.S. constitution in law and equity), and replaced it with corporate inequity at law through our voluntary participation and acceptance of their 14th Amendment: corporate “person” citizenship.
Confused? That’s precisely how politicians like it! Don’t worry—all will be explained in simple terms here. Stay with us. Get your head around this because when you do, a whole lot of stuff is going to fall into place.
On July 1, 1862, when 11 southern states were not represented in Congress due to the Civil War, the remaining members of Congress passed “An Act to provide Internal Revenue to support the Government and to pay Interest on the Public Debt.” These folks actually redefined the word “person” to mean a “corporation.” Are YOU a corporation? Here are their exact words:
“And be it further enacted, that on and after the first day of August, eighteen hundred and sixty-two, every individual, partnership, firm, association, or corporation, (and any word or words in this act indicating or referring to person or persons shall be taken to mean and include partnerships, firms, associations, or corporations, when not otherwise designated or manifestly incompatible with the intent thereof,) .” Thirty-Seventh Congress. Sess. II. Chap. CXIX. Page 432. Sec. 68. (p. 459.)
Don’t worry if you’re still scratching your head. That’s legal language for you! Some might say it’s designed that way! Allow me to backtrack a little and ask all you readers out there a very simple question:
When you wake up in the morning and look in the mirror while shaving, combing your hair, or brushing your teeth, what do you see?
Do you see a human being made of flesh and blood or do you see a corporation?
On July 28, 1868, a very different “citizenship” was created for us: One that made us subservient to a complete authority. Here, from section one of the 14th Amendment, are their words:
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
The original constitution created a state citizenship that can be found at Article IV, Section 2, Clause 1, of the United States constitution. The 14th Amendment makes everyone claiming to be a citizen a person.
You might think that a citizen and a person are one and the same thing. You may think we’re splitting hairs here. You might even consider yourself “a person.” But, within the meaning of the 14th Amendment, a person is a corporation. In fact, the 14th Amendment makes you a state resident, not a citizen, and places your primary citizenship within THE UNITED STATES (incorporated). That’s right, the United States is a corporation! And you are an employee!
By the way, when you have a chance, open up your Black’s Law 5th Edition and look up the term “subject to” that was written into this new and improved federal citizenship status. Here is what you will find:
Subject to. Liable, subordinate, subservient, inferior, obedient to; governed or affected by; provided that; provided; answerable for.
Now I don’t know about you, but that definition does not sit well with a free man such as myself. I AM NOT subservient or subordinate to ANY government and NEVER will be. What was/is wrong with the Common Law? What was/is wrong with just ‘not being an asshole’? Apparently THEY believe everything.
It becomes fairly obvious how the 14th Amendment makes one a corporate “citizen” under the complete control (jurisdiction) of the United States as a “person” of the United States. Remember, a “fictional” character such as a person can only be controlled by another fiction—such as a government or corporation. That which is created can never rise above its creator. Now do you see how it works?
Moving on…
The “term” United States means a federal corporation as well as several other meanings but one must remember that “terms” and “words” are not the same thing—especially in the courtroom. The United States referred to in the 14th Amendment is not our country. In fact it is not even a government. Our country, though actually not a country but a constitutionally bound union of sovereign and independent states is called The United States of America. There is a mighty big difference between the United States’ federal government and The United States of America.
Fact: The UNITED STATES is nothing more than a PRIVATE / FOR PROFIT corporation located in the District of Columbia. The District of Columbia became a private municipal corporation on February 21, 1871 through the Organic Act of 1871. It was created through a loophole in the Constitution called Article I, Section 8, Clause 17, when the legislative branch was establishing the seat of the federal government.
Fact: Not only does THEIR newly formed corporation have a very confusing name (exactly like the federal government), it also has powers “not inconsistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States.” Yes you read that correct. It is in the Congressional Record. Read it for yourself. They gave their private company all the powers of the Constitution. SEE: The FORTY-FIRST CONGRESS, SESS. III Ch. LXII (62).
Fact: The United States of the 14th Amendment makes the newly defined person a citizen “asset” of the incorporated Washington D.C. doing business as the UNITED STATES; an intentional and fraudulent misrepresentation of our lawful United States government. Many people are under the impression that the corporate body politic known as the United States (federal government) is the same UNITED STATES as the private / for profit corporation created by the legislative branch in 1871. It is not the same thing at all. These two “United States” have absolutely nothing in common. The private corporation known as the UNITED STATES has nothing to do with politics, the Constitution, or the Bill of Rights. Like any other business, it exists solely to produce its owners a profit. The 14th Amendment person is a “citizen” of a company, NOT A COUNTRY!
United States 28USC or Title 28- part VI – Chapter 176- subchapter A- subsection 3002
Definitions:
(15) “United States” means—
(A) a federal corporation;
(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or
(C) an instrumentality of the United States.
Still not convinced? Then check this out:
This new and different citizenship changed the American people’s standing in law entirely to one of corporate or commercial law. Every “crime” in the UNITED STATES, State, or federal territories is now of a commercial nature. See code of federal regulations title 27-72.11. This explains how 80-90% of all laws, taxes, and other perceived government authorities (not granted in the original Constitution) are able to function within their “legal” system. One must also remember that the concepts of lawful and legal operate on two entirely different planes. Something that works hand in hand with the Constitution is considered “lawful” or in law. The copyrighted British procedural system practiced by members of the American Bar Association is considered “legal” and at law with no connection or relationship to the Constitution whatsoever. Sadly, though few people know it, no “lawful” courtroom exists anywhere in America today. Let me say that again. There are no state courts anywhere in America. What we believe to be the courtrooms today are nothing more than private administrative Federal Reserve collection agents (judges) collecting on FDR’s 1933 United States bankruptcy. Of course, “judges” still pretend there is law when they know damn well there is none.
What’s Your Name?
Have you ever noticed how “your name” is written on any official document? Every federal state ID, driver’s license, summons to appear in any court, etc., has a person’s name expressed in all CAPITAL (corporate) letters. Don’t believe it? Take a look at any state issued card or document in your wallet or purse right now. You will find that all “State” or corporate issued documents have your “existence” expressed in this manner. Why? Though many believe Capitis Diminutio Maxima to be a patriot myth or conspiracy theory, it is interesting that nobody has ever come forth with definitive proof to the contrary. Again I refer you to Black’s Law 5th Edition:
Capitis diminutio maxima. The highest or most comprehensive loss of status. This occurred when a man’s condition changed from one of freedom to one of bondage, when he became a slave. It swept away with it all rights of citizenship and all family rights.
Next…
Take a look at the U.S. Constitution Bill of Rights, Amendments IX and X. These two amendments make clear that,
“powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
So where do politicians get the power to “legally” steal from the people? Where does it say that a county or city government has ANY authority to tax property? What about the federal income tax or public policy such as the Healthcare bill or the Patriot Act? And let’s not forget “statutory” law or local ordinances?
Here is the thing people, before we go on, I must be very clear about these issues because the answer may be too unbelievable for most people to deal with logically. Here it is: Because there are no common law courts left anywhere in the “country,” there is no rule of law anywhere in the continental United States that currently applies to free people. That includes every last man, woman, or child of flesh and blood. All existing courts are commercial and function for fictional creations only!
And here’s the kicker: if you claim to be a U.S. citizen, which is a “fictional” creation of the federal government under the 14th Amendment, every statute, act, ordinance, or bit of public policy they choose to write applies to YOU! EVERY LAST ONE OF THEM (and anything else Congress can think up of as well). Remember, that which is created can never rise above its creator. Got that?
So one might ask, why would the legislature of the Constitutional Republic of the United States of America do such a heinous and unconstitutional act to her own people just to gain jurisdictional authority not originally granted them? The answer is absolutely diabolical—to set them up to be ultimately responsible for their federal or national debt. That and control over us. Section 4 of the 14th Amendment declares that the public debt cannot be questioned. That means the fictional creation called “person” and citizen of the United States is responsible for the public debt. Their debt. A debt that can never be paid off because all “money” is loaned into existence. Money no longer represents gold or silver. It is created out of thin air. And we accept it as such. In fact, most people spend their whole lives chasing it. Baaaaaaaaaa…
Lest this all becomes too much to bear, I’m going to print the next sentence backwards, so that it takes a conscious effort to read…
.EVALS A ERA UOY
Sorry about that. Within the ten-year stretch from 1861 through 1871, the Constitutional Republic for the United States of America was quietly being converted to a privately owned and operated corporation—called the UNITED STATES—right under the noses of the American people. Our country now only operates under the “color of law” regarding the Constitution. Black’s Law 5th Edition:
Color of law. The appearance or semblance, without the substance, of legal right. Misuse of power, possessed by virtue of state law and made possible only because the wrongdoer is clothed with authority of state, is action taken under “color of law.”
The correct constitutional government for the American people did not survive the civil war. The correct constitutional government was replaced by a private corporation, within the District of Columbia, which was reorganized June 11, 1878, (Chapter 180, 20 Stat. 102) and renamed “United States government.” It is the perfect corporate government for the perfect corporate citizen of the United States “person” status.
Is our current situation lawful or constitutional? No, it is not. Even assuming the 14th Amendment had been properly ratified (which it was not) the supremacy clause of the organic U.S. Constitution, Article VI Paragraph 2, would strike it null for the act of creating a different form of government, citizenship, jurisdictions, and laws than what the founding fathers intended.
Other reasons the 14th Amendment is unconstitutional are as follows:
- It was not submitted to or adopted by a lawful constitutional congress. Article I, section 3, and Article V of the organic United States Constitution.
- The 14th was not submitted to the President for his approval. Article I, Section 7 U.S. Constitution.
- The 14th Amendment was rejected by more than 1/4 of all the states in the union. Article V.
- The U.S. Constitution provides Article I, Section 3 “The senate of the United States shall be composed of two senators from each state.”
- Article V provides “No State without its consent shall be deprived its equal suffrage in the senate.”
- Twenty-three senators had been unlawfully excluded from the US Senate in order to secure a 2/3 vote for adoption. See Congressional record June 13, 1967 pages 15461-15646. So, the amendment is unlawful and was never properly ratified.
If all this is true, how in the world did the 14th Amendment get passed?
The 14th Amendment was passed by a fake executive order #6 on July 20, 1868. Executive Order #7 of July 28, 1868, unlawfully certified the ratification of the 14th Amendment in order to publish it. It is important to note that nowhere within the written word of the Constitution is it lawful to ratify a constitutional amendment with an executive order. Further, Executive Orders #6 and #7 have only the appearance of being executive orders. The fact is, then sitting President, Andrew Johnson, who was totally against the 14th Amendment, actually claimed it created a de facto government. See: Journal of the House of Representatives, volume 64 page 563, March 2, 1867. Black’s Law 5th Edition:
De facto government. One that maintains itself by a display of force against the will of the rightful legal government and is successful, at least temporarily, in overturning the institutions of the rightful legal government by setting up its own in lieu thereof.
Executive Orders #6 and #7 were never signed by President Johnson. They were authorized with the signature of the Secretary of State William H. Sewart. Now you all know why the 14th Amendment was never lawfully ratified according to the U.S. Constitution and that even if it was properly ratified, the supremacy clause, Article VI, Paragraph 2, of the organic U.S. Constitution would have struck it null.
Here are some additional examples of how this unlawful and unconstitutional Amendment has changed the American way of life.
- School prayer struck down as unconstitutional through the 14th Amendment, Abington school District Vs. schempp 374 US 203 (1963)
- Abortion and the federal government through the 14th Amendment Roe Vs. Wade 410 US 113 (1973)
- Display of the Ten Commandments in public declared unconstitutional through the 14th Amendment Stone vs. Graham 449 U.S. 39 (1980).
- All gun control with the exception of states’ borders and shores’ edge is a 14th Amendment corporate jurisdiction.
- Income tax. A 14th Amendment corporate jurisdiction that explains why the 14th Amendment person or citizen of the United States is the only one required to pay it.
- Health care, carbon tax, even all of the public debt, just to name a few, are based on the unlawful 14th Amendment. See 14th Amendment Section 4 codex (tampering with our food).
- Driver’s licenses, tags for automobiles, traffic laws building permits, every crime where a human is not a damaged party to swear out a complaint is of 14th Amendment jurisdiction.
In closing, I would like to remind you. You are a flesh and blood human being. You are free. You are not a corporation unless you consent to it. There is a way out. And I invite each and every one of you to my www.dirtyunclesam.com website, and to start researching for yourself. There is more than enough there, not only to keep you busy for quite some time, but maybe—just maybe—to find something that will help you to better understand how and why we got to be in the mess that we are in. Friends, we are in some real trouble here in America and I’m afraid if we don’t wake up soon our only resort will be to get this information out through “gardening magazines.”
“None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.”
~ Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
EVALS A ERA UOY
Does that mean “You are a Slave”?
Nice article. The American people need to know these facts before they EVER head back to the voting booths. What a farce DC actually is.
Those so-called elected officials in DC are mass murderers. They are killing people for profit worldwide in the name of “democracy” and must be stopped immediately. The genocide perpetrated by those in Washington are far beyond criminal and must be punished to the n’th degree.
Blog ON, Bruce – excellent job!
The work is already going on we are inhabiting The Republic and all the state republics. The only LAWFUL form of Governance & Servance.
Help us end the Unlawful Lawyer Monopoly in DC and Democracy Slavery.
Help us restore the LAWFUL Original 13th Amendment (Bing it/Google it) and inhabit the Lawful Sovereign Republics.
http://www.RepublicfortheunitedStates.org.
God’s Blessings and Long Live the sovereign republics.
“…if we don’t wake up soon our only resort will be to get this information out through “gardening magazines.”…”
What better place to sow seeds? I’m just sayin.
Too little too late!
We are in a freefall that is beyond control.
There are no measures that can be applied to
change things enough, even if enough of us woke up to the truth, too late, sooo sadd.
Don’t forget, 3/4 of the people are happy to be sheeple living in a daze, unaware of the real world around them.
i think its time the real americans take our country back !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Quote – “Most Americans probably aren’t ready to accept the facts of life, especially as they are presented in this article.”
Meaning: If you don’t agree you must be in denial. (or perhaps just educated)
Quote – “Sadly, either we believe we “know it all” already, or we do not possess the literacy skills to comprehend them.”
And here is our comic relief.. the sheer irony of this statement is enough to rofl.
Quote – “He’s running for a U.S. Senate seat in Florida”
LOL … We all probably have “that guy” running for office in our area.
This guy, and his silly points, wouldn’t last 2 minutes discussing the issue of corporate privilege or person hood with anyone actually credible on the topic.
Kudos for learning a little something about your history. Shame that it is perceived through such a pinhole of a perspective. I hope you enjoyed your 15 minutes, buh bye.
2″hydroguy”.
Sure, fellas like u are so educated and so acknowledged in the “topic”.
What Mr. Riggs is trying here is to tell u (and I’ll bet $200 on spot) that u’ve had no clue about ur country history.
Which “guy” do u have in ur area? Solomon Shmooze for the County Board Commission?
Shut-up and learn.
I’m surprised Urban Garden printed such drivel. It’s not worth trying to get beyond all the insults, hyperbole and sarcasm. If the writer has something intelligent to say it should be presented in a clear logical argument.
By the way, if all we had was common law it would still be legal to put 10 year olds to work in mines and we would have no protection at all from shoddy merchandise. We would have no public school system and no public road ways.
“Common law” is based on the historical decisions of judges who were appointed by kings. Civil law is based on legislation passed by elected officials.
I do believe that democracy around the world has been gutted and we have lost control of the political system if we ever had it.
Some, or many, civil laws may be faulty but they aren’t all faulty. The problem is not the type of law system that exists, it is corruption of politicians and the military/industrial complex. Business, not the people, have control of the legislature.
That corporations have been granted the status of personhood does not mean that individuals are corporations. It means that both individuals and corporations have the status of “person” under the law. Therefore, every law written with the word “person” refers to both corporations and individuals.
“It’s an awareness that comes from an innate and shared sense that something is very wrong with the world we’ve been born into. And it’s coupled with an urgent realization that it’s up to us to change it, or tolerate it. The choice is ours.”
I agree with the above.
“Most Americans probably aren’t ready to accept the facts of life, especially as they are presented in this article. Sadly, either we believe we “know it all” already, or we do not possess the literacy skills to comprehend them. ”
Terrific start. Insulting “most Americans”.
I do not believe I “know it all” and my literacy skills are just fine thanks. Either the author of the article doesn’t know what “Common Law” is or thinks the rest of us are too stupid to know what it actually is so will accepts the writer’s definition.
“That’s right, the United States is a corporation! And you are an employee!”
Really, any support for that statement. I haven’t started recieving any paychecks from the government yet so I find it hard to believe I am their employee. No where is anything quoted that states the US government is a corporation. If you want me to believe that, please present some proof. The quotes offered certainly don’t state that the US is a corporation.
“It becomes fairly obvious how the 14th Amendment makes one a corporate “citizen” under the complete control (jurisdiction) of the United States as a “person” of the United States. Remember, a “fictional” character such as a person can only be controlled by another fiction—such as a government or corporation. That which is created can never rise above its creator. Now do you see how it works?”
Sorry, I’m too stupid to “see how it works”.
“Subject to. Liable, subordinate, subservient, inferior, obedient to; governed or affected by; provided that; provided; answerable for. ”
One is also “subject to” common law. Common law was/is set by unelected judges and is based on precedences that occured over centuries. Civil law is created by elected officials. I completely agree that our government is under the strong influence if not outright control of multi-national corporations. I’m well aware of the Carlyle group (http://www.carlyle.com/company/item1676.html) and the project for a New American Century (http://www.newamericancentury.org/).
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080418203956AAZC2dl
“I’m a lawyer and I am not familiar with the term. According to one site I read it is a term referenced in Black’s Law Dictionary but no online legal dictionaries I checked had the term. The word capitis in Latin has to do with the head, not with capital letters.
The US Constitution is the supreme law of the country (see Marbury v. Madison) and contains nothing about this alleged doctrine. However, it does abolish slavery (14th Amendment). As such, there’s no legal support for this alleged doctrine. The Admiralty Courts (which some sites claim are the way this doctrine is invoked) are inferior courts to the Supreme Court and the lower federal circuit courts. (See Article III of the Constitution).
This doctrine did exist in Roman Law (http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09079a.h… but had nothing to do with capital letters at all. That’s just invention by people with too much paranoia and time on their hands.
Dana (attorney)”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitis_deminutio
”
Capitis deminutio is a term used in Roman trials referring to the extinguishing, either in whole or in part, of a person’s former legal capacity.
There were three changes of state or condition attended with different consequences, maxima, media and minima. The greatest, capitis deminutio maxima, involved the loss of liberty, citizenship, and family (e.g. being made a slave or prisoner of war). The next change of state, capitis deminutio media, consisted of a loss of citizenship and family without any forfeiture of personal liberty. The least change of state, capitis deminutio minima, consisted of a person ceasing to belong to a particular family, without loss of liberty or citizenship.[1]
Translation: Capitis means of head (genitive case of caput), deminutio means decrease or withdrawal, and maxima, media, and minima means the greatest, medium, and the least.
The term has no connection to financial capital, use of capital letters, political capitals, or capitol buildings, except that some of these involved “heads” in some way. A person’s state under modern law is not affected by whether the person’s name is spelled normally or in all capital letters.”
The US is not subject to Roman law and it had nothing to do with the use of capital letters.
“It is created out of thin air. And we accept it as such. In fact, most people spend their whole lives chasing it. Baaaaaaaaaa…”
Okay, so take all the advertising off your site and stop charging for the magazine because otherwise you must be a sheep.
Apparently the authors also want school prayers, (although how one would have school prayers without any schools is a conundrum) and to abolish everything from abortion rights to drivers licences.
The writers appear to be promoting some sort of weird melding of anarchy and religion.
Thanks, but no thanks, and that doesn’t make me a “sheep” or an idiot incapable of comprehending a simplistic crackpot article.
Unless you want this to be a gardening magazine for poorly educated conspiracy theorists I suggest you stick to gardening articles.
Regards,
Gisele
To Infosaturated. Sir it’s not drivel if it’s the sugar coated truth. This article was not meant to be insulting. The insult is we Americans are even more SHEEPLE than that. The entire so called federal U.S. Government (taxes,laws jurisdiction) is, and has been, run under this de facto jurisdiction since of the 14th Amendment 1868. Noticed the lawyer Gisele who commented after you not once did he try to establish that the 14th Amendment is lawful. And he makes his (hustle) living of this de facto jurisdiction. And as a clear logical argument is concerned. You seem to understand it. If not how did you get your feelings insulted by this article if it was not understandable and clear? And if you want to live under an additional other than our lawful common law system. Hey that’s your right( as a truly free people to give up your right voluntary). But remember it’s my birth right as an American to be a truly free people (kings on our land is what we were meant to be Constitutionally) the original Constitutional citizenship. If you want to lie under a more controlled system, well that should be every other country other than America. Pick one. I want to be a truly free people, not a corporate owned PERSON.
The original public school had a state jurisdiction and so was your citizenship. Ben Franklin helped set up the first public school system. They taught out of a book called the Primer which he also helped to write. The Primer taught kids to read and write while teaching about God at the same time. Look at an old map. We’ve had public roads before the 14th Amendment. How do you think the wagons got out west?? They didn’t fly did they? Didn’t most of those trails become the early roads of America? And you go on to say that democracy has been gutted. All of what you’re calling “gutting was and is being done with the same corporate jurisdiction we’re tring to make you aware of.
You are correct the word “person” does have more than one meaning. Congress redefined the meaning of the word “person” giving it the meaning of a corporation in 1862 http://www.dirtyunclesam.com/Person-act.pdf also see the three minute mark of my video at the top of this page showing that a corporation is a person within the meaning of the 14th Amendment. The 14th Amendment makes all person citizens of the UNITED STATES (this term also has several meanings http://tinyurl.com/374szxf and http://tinyurl.com/33epzb
I am saddened and embarressed for these folks “representing” the public. They are either too naive or incredibly shameless to be truly honest.
Three quick questions for all the attorneys out there in the Law Society:
- Why must one “represent himself” when he is in the flesh and blood – physically standing in the courtroom?
-What exactly is the difference between a man’s “person” and the man physically standing there in the courtroom?
-Why are ALL statutes written for “persons” and NOT for men, women, or people?
-Are statutes lawful Article III judiciary concerns for men, women, and people or only gunpoint enforced legislative policy pertaining to “persons” subject to The State of New Columbia?
I will address the rest of the apparent concerns on Monday when I have some real time to devote to these issues.
Wow Gisele, I hear ya. However, I think you should post your own words rather than links to research that someone else did. It gives more credibility to your words.
I see that this article really ignites some debate and the guys that put this together are referencing articles from history. I researched the validity of the documents referenced in the video and the article noticed that most are available at thomas.lib.gov (Library of Congress). A reputable source I’d say.
Unfortunately your post lost any validity by attacking the writers. Yahoo answers? Come on man… At least put a link to a reputable source. Better yet, ask me a question on Yahoo and I’ll give you the answer you seek.
Lawyer Gisele. Want proof the US Government is a corporation? See 28 U.S.C.(United States Code) 3002, 15(a)(15) “United States” means—
(A) a Federal corporation;
Here’s a link http://tinyurl.com/33epzb You’re more of a trust member than employee especially since exectuive order 12303 April 30,1992 (privatization of the United States. What else could be said about human capital? See Executive order 13037. Next, the term “subject to” – we use a word for word quote in the article from Blacks Law Dictionary 5th edition, so how are we wrong? Look up the word “free” in Blacks Law Dictionary 4th edition page 791 – it says “not subject to legal restraint of another.” The definition of “subject to” Blacks Law Dictionary 4th edition page 1594 is “Liable, subordinate, subservient, inferior,obedient to,Governed,affected by” You don’t have a Blacks Law Dictionary and you’re a lawyer? Sounds like you need one. (Ebay used around $20.)
The three links you provided are useless. The first is a law firm add. The second link didn’t work when I tried it. The third is a Yahoo blog on someone claiming to an attorney (not only hearsay, but who is this attorney to say a law dictionary is wrong??? And why are you sheeple enough to believe him? Next, the same thing on the term “CAPITIS DIMINUTIO MAXIMA” – we use a word for word quote from Blacks Law Dictionary 5th edition so what makes us wrong and you right? Blacks Law Dictionary 4th edition page 264 CAPITIS DIMINUTIO MAXIMA” The highest or most comprehensive loss of status. This occurred when a man’s condition changed from one of freedom to one of bondage, when he became a slave. It swept away with it all rights of citizenship and all family rights. I think you may have forgotton the word MAXIMA in your research. Fortunately I’m not your client.
My showing on 14th Amendment abortion,school prayor,religion was how this unlawful jurisdtion is used to decide cases. I never took a position on any issues. Just examples. And I don’t think it makes you a sheeple or an idot because you can’t correctly comprehend simple legal terms. Even when there quoted directly and the source is cited (Blacks Law Dictionary). Next you call us conspiracy theorists. How? When we prove what we’re saying as we go? Your post is theoristic in nature and not law driven.
This article can be interpreted as the future of gardening or the lack thereof if you wish! Senate bill S510, a 14th Amendment jurisdiction de facto Senate, could be used to ban gardens and further the monopoly over our food supply.
Finally Gisele. Did you know corporations issue stocks and bonds? Ever hear of US Saving Bonds?
Prior to the election if anyone would have proved this man wrong that was running against him, like he said in the video he would drop out of the race. No one ever proved him wrong… I was with him. Two other canadites also running for the same office, became his students, Ha, imagine that! Sheeple, spit out that grass and become free people again. The governments been baaaaad too long. Quoting Henery Ford ” It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning.” And the 14th Amendment is the jurisdtion that allowed the Federal Reserve and other bankers interest rob our country blind. The orignal Constutional Republic was conqured from with in. Thanks to the jurisdtion of the 14th Amendment.
Very good Article Bruce and friends… I hear about this and I listen very interesting video about couple of years go on the same issue. After read so much in the subject I have to agree that America has been stole under the people’s nose, long time ago, many people till today still don’t know what happen or how we got here…Has been for the progressives very slow movement, but they keep in course while America were sleeping… You can see by those who answer with personal issues, that the sheep is all around us.
Those that feel compel to argue the point as if this article is insulting anyone, they need for most two things, learn how to read, and paid attention on what has been going on for so long here… yes, this Country is full of sheep, that either need to be waking up or give them some guide so they know what direction to take.
As psychologist I can said that those that take themselves out of the equation as being single insult, is because in their heart they try to deny the truth, they will prefer to be ignorant than not, because in many people’s mind when one is ignorant don’t have to be impose to feel uncomfortable.
I will share with others, this is a great article. Thank you for putting the info together in such easy way to understand.
May God be with all of you.
Baaadd politicians! The truth will set us FREE! Thanks Bruce for the insights. My God bless the flesh and blood humans who are trying to correct this crime upon humanity. Amen! So Be It!
I see people in here arguing truth, maybe the facts are arguable, but the truth never should be. Law should not be a tool to justify any system of ideals / beliefs above any other system , we should only have one law anyways and that is give only what you wish to truly receive , and i mean truly , at the core of what one thinks is real, may not be so unless it benifits all life on earth, either way , humans spend far to much time being analytical instead of just living, and life is the very first thing that is fully applicable to all members of the universe, where being analytical is a fully individual expierience. if there is anyway to think with a global / universal mind, then please do so, make the goal benifit all, and remember that we literally may not have enough earth-time to be caught up in analytical semantics …. thanx 4 reading !
SB510 “FDA Food Safety Modernization Act” (section 101 part 4 clause 2)
“…each person (excluding farms and restaurants) who manufactures, processes, packs, distributes, receives, holds, or imports…”
This bill removes the right of the “person” to handle food… Check it out
Gisele… If you are a lawyer I hope you paid for your DIS/MISINFORMED education because if you got any government grants or loans you stole it from “We the People”.
All I want too say is Alex Jones…..
GM crops is a No No
Stand up for your rights
Do not listen to the people who govern you….. they are in there last stages of enslaving you!
Wake up before it is too late……..
I am a free thinker and I bow down too no one else but myself……
UK
This ‘freedom to think and act with your own free will’ is all good in theory…. You know: people being happy with their lives, communities having a much higher level of communal spirit and interaction, helping your common man and becoming more in tune with the collective conscience etc etc etc
But surely its so much easier and convenient to be told what to think about something, or just to dilligiently follow directions with no moral concern for what the outcome of your actions would be. Too much effort is involved for my liking when trying to think for yourself so I just leave it down to the TV to tell how to feel about something. Sky news is usually the best source of information, failing that FOX network.
Other than the TV I usually just make sure all my views conform to that of all my peers. If i do ever think ‘outside the box’, I usually keep that thought to myself and try to bury it deep down inside me, much like a bad child-hood memory.
I think we could all benefit from spending less time questioning what we are told and just take everything as gospel. That way we could all spend more time thinking of how you could improve your work rate efficiency for your employer, or, reporting any overly individual actions or to your local official. That way, there would never be anything to distract from your daily routine of work/eat/sleep and cause you to think for yourself, which we all know requires far too much effort.
What’s the motivation of the writer here? If it’s anything other than loneliness it’s pretty well disguised. Persuasion in the form of insulting people and calling them “sheeple” is pretty unconvincing.
Let’s tell the author what he wants to hear, either 1. Generic ignorant statement to further polarise your position or 2. We love you.
On the actual topic (although if that really mattered there would surely be less insults), some people aren’t disproportionally obsessed with language, law, and arguments, and if they were actually and consciously affected by the issues are quite satisfied that they could deal with it.